Ayano Shimizu vs Yeon Woo Ku Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 19 Jun at 03:47 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
A. Shimizu vs Y. Woo Ku

JPN
2
Win
Played
1
Win

KOR
2
Win
Played
1
Win
Head-to-head: Shimizu 2 - 1 Ku
They have played 6 sets in total, with Ayano Shimizu winning 4 and Yeon Woo Ku winning 2. The last match between Yeon Woo Ku and Ayano Shimizu was at the W35 Taipei, 20-06-2025, Round: QF, Surface: Hard, with Yeon Woo Ku getting the victory 6-0 6-2.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Shimizu | 2 |
| Ku | 1 |
Last 3 H2H Matches:
(QF) W35 Taipei(06-20-25)
(F) W15 Kashiwa(04-06-25)
(R2) W40 Yokohama(11-29-23)
A. Shimizu vs Y. W. Ku H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $118,625 | Career Prize Money | $9,533 |
| 59.79% (287-193) | Career Total W/L | 64.51% (209-115) |
| 2 | Hard | 1 |
| 8 | Titles | 6 |
| 2 | Total H2H Matches | 1 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0.00% (0-1) |
A. Shimizu vs Y. W. Ku Match Preview:
- Ku has demonstrated stronger second serve performance recently, winning 39.47% of the points, compared to Shimizu's 34.82%. Could this give Ku a slight edge in serving?
- In terms of returning, Shimizu is a bit more effective on their opponent's second serve at 53.24% versus Ku's 51.67%. Will this ability to break serve often be the deciding factor?
- When saving breakpoints, Ku performs better, having a 50.73% success rate, whereas Shimizu saves 38.41%. Who can handle pressure situations more effectively?
- Overall match performance over the past year favors Shimizu, who has won 65.15% of games compared to Ku's 59.68%.
- Ku's best surface is indoor hard courts with a 69% win rate, while Shimizu excels on clay, winning 63% of matches on that surface.
- Both players frequently compete in Challengers/ITF events, but Shimizu has a better win rate (63.64%) compared to Ku's 58.33%.
- The head-to-head record strongly favors Shimizu, who has won both past encounters against Ku, including all four sets played.
- The average rank of opponents played by both is quite similar, suggesting comparable competition levels, with Ku's opponents averaging a rank of 401.03, just ahead of Shimizu's at 405.79.
- In deciding sets, Shimizu proves superior, winning 59% of them over the past year, compared to Ku's 29%.
- When it comes to converting break points, Shimizu is more efficient with a 44.75% conversion rate, as opposed to Ku's 35.14%.
Editorial Prediction (June 19, 2025, UTC):
The data suggests that Ayano Shimizu holds a slight advantage over Nao Ku, especially in pressure situations and on Ku’s preferred surfaces.
Shimizu's higher success rate in break-point conversion and return games indicates an ability to seize opportunities when they arise.
Moreover, their head-to-head record, where Shimizu has won all previous matches without dropping a set, further boosts their chances in this matchup.
While Ku has improved in areas like second-serve points, Shimizu's overall consistency and mental fortitude in tight matches suggest that they are more likely to come out on top in this encounter.
Considering these factors, Shimizu is the likely victor in this upcoming match.
Ayano Shimizu vs Yeon Woo Ku Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
A. Shimizu vs Y. W. Ku H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches Won | 1 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 26 | Games Won | 22 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 3 |
| 6 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 1:8:24 | Average Match Time | 1:8:24 |
| 66% (119/180) | 1st Serve % | 75% (109/146) |
| 58% (69/119) | 1st Serve Win % | 57% (62/109) |
| 46% (28/61) | 2nd Serve Win % | 38% (14/37) |
| 60% (12/20) | Break Pts Won % | 42% (10/24) |
| 48% (70/146) | Return Points Win % | 46% (83/180) |
| 67% (2/3) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 33% (1/3) |
| 100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/2) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/2) |
Recent Performance Stats
A. Shimizu Recent Matches Played
Y. W. Ku Recent Matches Played

A. Shimizu vs Y. W. Ku Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 59.79% (287/193) | YTD Win/Loss | 64.51% (209/115) |
| 57.10% (623/468) | Sets Win/Loss | 63.65% (471/269) |
| 52.56% (5131/4632) | Games Win/Loss | 57.15% (3807/2855) |
| 53.19% (150/132) | Hard Win/Loss | 64.17% (163/91) |
| 60.38% (32/21) | Clay Win/Loss | 64.86% (24/13) |
| 73.48% (97/35) | Indoor Hard W/L | 68.97% (20/9) |
| 61.54% (8/5) | Grass Win/Loss | 50.00% (2/2) |
| 0.02 | Aces Per Game | 0.07 |
| 114 | Aces Total | 234 |
| 0.25 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.32 |
| 1176 | Total Double Faults | 1042 |
| 1:19:12 | Average Match Time | 1:25:33 |
| 502.56 | Average Opponent Rank | 465.28 |
| 68% (18486/27179) | 1st Serve % | 64% (11987/18761) |
| 58% (10679/18486) | 1st Serve Win % | 61% (7292/11987) |
| 44% (3815/8699) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (3068/6774) |
| 51% (1796/3513) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 52% (1427/2754) |
| 48% (12838/27009) | Return Points Win % | 50% (9411/18741) |
| 40.00% (4/6) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 28.57% (2/5) |
| 23.53% (4/13) | Main Tour W/L | 50.00% (4/4) |
| 58.17% (210/151) | Challenger W/L | 62.33% (139/84) |
| 75.00% (69/23) | Futures W/L | 74.42% (64/22) |
| 59% (280/472) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 65% (207/320) |
| 100% (4/4) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 60% (46/77) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 48% (32/67) |
| 61% (80/131) | Deciding Set Win % | 42% (39/92) |
| 89% (268/239) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (216/185) |
| 11% (268/29) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (216/31) |
| 23% (212/49) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 22% (108/24) |